Каталог навыков агентов

Walk a maintainer through deep, sequential code review of open PRs on the configured `<upstream>` repo. Defaults to the...

Architectural code review — coding standards, SOLID, testability, performance concerns.

Use this skill for this scope: evidence dimension: review the actual diff for defects, regression and security findings....

Realize análises de código seguindo as práticas de engenharia da Sentry. Use ao revisar pull requests, examinar alteraçõ...

Review code for correctness, security, and clarity — in priority order.

Conduct standardized code reviews using the project's quality checklist. Provides structured feedback with severity leve...

You are a senior code reviewer ensuring high standards of code quality and security.

Structured code review with security, performance, and architecture checklists. Use when reviewing pull requests, code c...

Code review checklist covering security, performance, defensive programming, and testing anti-patterns. Use before mergi...

Use when reviewing code. Triggers: 'review my code', 'check my work', 'look over this', 'review PR #X', 'PR comments to...

Self-review local changes before creating a PR. Use when the user says "review", "review my code", "check my changes", o...

Review code quality, patterns, and best practices

Review code written during a run, auto-fix no-brainer issues, and suggest improvements requiring confirmation. Invoked a...

Review generated code for style, security, and architecture issues; suggest refactorings and performance improvements. U...

Pre-merge code review skill for diffs, staged changes, single files, or pull requests. Emphasises naming honesty (does t...

The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards,...

Reviews code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Auto-invoke when implementation is complete and the work...

AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomo...

Close PRs at an evidence gate or review local diffs/PRs with specialists and JSON artifacts.

Owns the local review cycle over three engines — CodeRabbit, Greptile, and Macroscope (`.coderabbit.yaml`, `.greptile/`,...

Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems

Review a PR, branch, commit, or local diff for actionable defects and regressions.

Code review entire project

当用户要求"审查代码"、"代码检查"、"检查bug"、"代码质量检查"、"发现问题"、"重构建议"，或者提到"代码审查"、"code review"、"审查"、"检查"时使用此技能。用于代码质量、潜在bug、性能问题、安全漏洞或改进机会的反...

Provides code review rules, anti-patterns, scoring rubric, and duplication detection heuristics for the code-reviewer ag...

Conducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedb...

Run a comprehensive code review

Multi-pass code review using Rule of 5 principle

Load this skill when reviewing a pull request or someone else's diff: what to review first, blocking versus advisory com...

Review the actual diff defect-first with evidence: correctness, security, performance, compat, tests. Severities blocker...

Review code changes with security, performance, and style checks

Enforces systematic multi-axis code review (correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance) with severity...

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — repo Standards and the orig...

How to review code; a pull request, feature branch, local changes etc.

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, o...

Review and score code quality across 12 dimensions. Read-only analysis with numeric scoring. Use to diagnose issues befo...

Code Review sistemático - Checklist completo para revisão de código

This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes bef...

Adversarial multi-agent code review orchestrator with consensus voting and multi-repo support. CRITICAL: ONLY activate t...

Review a code change independently for correctness, regression risk, maintainability, compatibility, tests, and unsafe a...

Use for read-only review of PRs, diffs, commits, or implementations. Evaluate the simplest design meeting current requir...

Fan out six focused reviewer personas against the current PR — correctness, testing, maintainability, project-standards,...

Always use this skill before claiming any work is done, fixed, passing, or complete — even if it seems obvious. Also use...

从固定点（commit、branch、tag 或 merge-base）开始，沿两条轴线审查变更——规范（代码是否遵循仓库文档化的编码规范？）和规格（代码是否与原始 issue/PRD 的要求一致？）。两条审查线在并行子 agent 中运行...

Structured code review focusing on correctness, security, and maintainability. Correctness before style. Every reviewer...

Review DevOps code including Dockerfiles, Terraform, Kubernetes manifests, Helm charts, CI/CD pipelines, and shell scrip...

Systematic multi-perspective code review with consistent quality gates.

Comprehensive parallel code review using 5 specialized subagents: general, architectural, TypeScript, product/vision, an...

Complete code review workflow for both requesting and receiving reviews. Use when creating PRs, reviewing code, or respo...

[Code Quality] Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when complet...

Review changed code for naming, stale references, unnecessary complexity, and comment quality. Use after completing impl...

Code review a pull request

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code fo...

Review a diff for correctness, edge cases, regressions and maintainability, with blocking findings separated from sugges...

Review code for quality and security

Use this when reviewing AEM Edge Delivery Services (EDS, Franklin, Helix) code, either self-review at the end of develop...

Review code for quality, security, performance, and maintainability. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing a codebase, or ref...

Use when asked to review a PR, MR, branch, or diff, audit changed files, or check code quality.

Review Python source using the repo-review-kit Reviewer and analyzer.

Analyser du code modifie et lister les problemes en se basant sur les regles et conventions evan-workflow.

Use when the user says "review this", "check my code", or wants feedback on changes. Reviews for correctness, quality, s...

코드 리뷰 체크리스트. PR 전 자체 검토용. 필수/권장/금지 항목 정리.

Systematic code review for correctness, security, and growth — not just style enforcement

Review code with ESLint, React Doctor, TypeScript, Prettier, npm audit, and CodeRabbit CLI, plus a manual correctness/se...

Review staged and unstaged code changes for FastLED coding standards violations, span usage mandates, and example qualit...

body elided by portability-corpus-gen.py

Standards for performing high-quality, readable code reviews.

对代码变更进行多维度审查，结合项目技术栈（Spring Boot + MyBatis + AgentScope + React）进行专项检查，输出结构化报告

Conduct thorough, constructive code reviews that improve code quality and team knowledge. Focuses on what matters - arch...

Provides thorough code review with actionable feedback

Review code for correctness, security, performance, and Resume Matcher conventions. Use when receiving code review feedb...

Stack-aware code quality and security review of current branch changes

Reviews code for quality, best practices, and potential issues. Use when asked to review, audit, or check code for probl...

Review changes or PRs against project guidelines

Use when finishing a task, before merging, or when giving or receiving code review feedback on this repo - covers when t...

多语言代码多维度专业 Code Review：以语义一致性为核心，覆盖安全、Bug 风险、规范、架构、性能、测试覆盖，输出分级问题清单。触发："review 这个提交"、"code review"、"检查这段代码"，或提供 git diff...

Review code quality, receive feedback with technical rigor, verify completion claims. Use before PRs, after implementing...

Review Julia code for correctness, performance, numerical stability, AD compatibility, and maintainability. Use when rev...

Use after completing tasks to review code for quality and spec compliance. Two-stage review: Spec Compliance first, then...

Perform a mandatory scoped code review for the code changed in the current task. Use when Codex has implemented or modif...

Conduct effective code reviews that improve code quality, share knowledge, and maintain team standards. Focus on constru...

Review changes since a commit/branch/tag/merge-base along two axes — repo coding standards, and match to the originating...

Review code quality, receive feedback with technical rigor, verify completion claims. Use before PRs, after implementing...

Use when game source or implementation files need architecture, quality, performance, standards, or testability review.

Thorough code review practices and checklists. Covers security review, performance analysis, maintainability assessment,...

Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compli...

Review code changes against PyPTO project standards before committing. Use when reviewing code, preparing commits, check...

Review code changes using Hyperlane monorepo coding standards. Use when reviewing PRs, checking your own changes, or doi...

Multi-axis review of diffs before merge. Use when reviewing a PR, branch, or local changes; when asking if a change is s...

Review a PR or feature branch commit by commit so sync-merged changes are not misattributed. Skip feedback on uncommitte...

Review a scoped change for correctness, coverage and material risk. Triggers on "review this", "代码审查".

When the user wants a thorough code review of changes, a PR, a file, or a feature branch. Use when the user says "review...

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes - Standards (does the code fo...

Use when the user asks for a full review of a change, pull request, or merge request against the personal checklist, cov...

· Review code for correctness: bugs, edge cases, races, leaks, regressions. Triggers: 'review', 'code review', 'find bug...