code-review

Review code for correctness, security, and clarity — in priority order.

SKILL.md

GitHub

When to use

The user asks for a review, a critique, or "is this OK?" on some code.

How

  1. read_file the code first — never review from memory.
  2. Report findings in priority order: correctness bugs → security → clarity/maintainability → style.
  3. For each: the location (file:line), why it matters, and a concrete fix.
  4. Point to lines; don't rewrite the whole file unless asked.

Avoid

  • Praise and filler — get to the signal.
  • Inventing nits when the code is fine; say it's fine.
  • Burying a real bug among trivial style notes.

Done well

A terse, prioritised list the author can act on immediately — bugs first, each with a concrete fix.