Навыки: Тестирование

Build or improve a job seeker's resume.md source file from conversational career input. Use when the user wants to creat...

Draft or revise a resume for one specific job using an exact resume version, a complete JD, and grounded match evidence....

Help the user turn their Retentioneering ideas, friction reports, bug findings, or feature needs into high-quality upstr...

Use when the task came back to QA after need_revision - what to re-run, what may carry over, and how to keep old passes...

Analyze sprint retrospectives for patterns and action item tracking. Usage: /retro analyze <retro_data.json>

Post-invocation retrospective. Tracks skill issues and applies fixes automatically.

Synthesize retrospectives into themes, root causes, decisions, and team improvements.

When stuck in red for >5 turns or >3 failed runs without progress, propose reverting the latest production-code edits to...

Code review with semantic diffs, expert routing, and auto-TaskCreate. Triggers on: code review, review changes, check co...

Verify implementation conforms to planning artifacts. Checks API routes against OpenAPI spec, schema against ERD, domain...

Conduct code review with quality checks, architecture validation, and framework compliance. TRIGGER when: user wants cod...

Pre-landing PR review. (gstack)

Use when reviewing code changes (PRs, diffs, or files) with parallel specialized agents. 8-agent review with self-challe...

Multi-agent code review covering architecture, tests, performance, docs, lint, security, and Application Programming Int...

Review diffs, find mocks, scan bugs, audit code.

Full 10-point expert code review. Use before any PR or MR. Checks correctness, cross-layer consistency, transaction safe...

Review code for quality, root cause analysis, and fix confidence. Supports PR review and local review of uncommitted/bra...

Run a structured adversarial code review (critique → defense → rebuttal → verdict) with evidence-backed findings and sta...

You are an expert code reviewer specializing in Phoenix/Elixir applications, with deep knowledge of the Lanttern educati...

GitHub issueの対応内容をレビューし、改善タスクを作成します。専門家エージェント（coding/architecture/testing/document-specialist）によるレビューを実施し、指摘点を元にtmp/todo...

Comprehensive code review with multi-angle analysis using parallel agents

Review a plan with Critic

Run a standard Claude Code review of local git changes in this repository. Args: --wait, --background, --base <ref>, --s...

コードの品質をレビューする。 コミット前の最終チェック・PR レビュー・既存コードの品質監査に使用する。 仕様準拠・危険フラグ・CLAUDE.md 規約の 3 観点で検査する。

Code review for quality, security, and best practices. Use when: - User asks to "review", "check", "look at" code - Befo...

Plan-aware graph-enhanced code review before merge. CRITICAL issues block merge. Use after fix/verify.

Review and score code using a 6-dimension rubric. Use when user shares code for feedback or asks for code review.

Review code changes for quality, security, and correctness

Code quality check with adaptive effort scaling. Includes security scanning.

Code review current changes against project standards

Use after implementation is complete and before creating a PR — agent-driven code review checking spec compliance, code...

Intelligent, self-validating pull request reviewer that automatically selects the appropriate review lens based on chang...

[Review & Quality] ⚡⚡ Perform comprehensive code review

Drive one confidence stage at a time: dispatch challenger passes for challenge and reviewer passes for review, validate...

Review code for common issues. Use when reviewing PRs, suggesting code changes, or when user asks to review code.

Run a senior-level code review on staged or recent changes

Runs review-stage validation for scope changes, findings, and follow-up task derivation. Use when review stage needs ver...

Pre-merge review - verify tests, docs, and merge readiness for an expedition

Use when user invokes /review to review code changes. Also triggers on "review my code", "check this PR", "look at my ch...

Use when the user wants a code review, quality check, or asks to review their changes.

Review project files for consistency, completeness, and correctness. Use when asked to review, audit, check, or validate...

현재 변경 사항을 코드 리뷰합니다. 버그, 보안 취약점, 아키텍처 위반, 테스트 누락 등을 점검합니다.

(ePost) Use when user says "review", "check my code", "is this good", "look at this before I commit", or "suggest improv...

Cross-cutting artifact review using a two-file filesystem protocol. Works across windows without copy-paste.

Run the qa agent to validate the current state of barista.p8. Use when the user asks to review, validate, or check the g...

Review code with specialized security, quality, and silent-failure agents.

Comprehensive code review with parallel specialist sub-agents. Analyzes requirements traceability, code quality, securit...

Code review: systematic single-file, parallel multi-reviewer, full-repo audit, PR diff review.