code-report

Generates implementation reports from executed parallel plans. Use when documenting completed work, listing changed files, or recording test guidance.

SKILL.md

GitHub

Code Report Generator

Generate structured implementation reports documenting changes made during plan execution. This is an optional Step 4 in the planning workflow, providing comprehensive documentation of what was implemented.

Operational context: After implement-plan, write docs/plans/[feature-name]/report.md with an overview, changed files, implemented features, and test guidance; report generation is optional.

Workflow Integration

This skill is the optional final step of the planning workflow. It requires parallel-plan.md to exist.

┌─────────────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐     ┌─────────────────┐
│ shared-context  │ ──▶ │  parallel-plan  │ ──▶ │ implement-plan  │ ──▶ │   code-report   │
│  (Step 1)       │     │  (Step 2)       │     │   (Step 3)      │     │ (Step 4 - Opt)  │
└─────────────────┘     └─────────────────┘     └─────────────────┘     └─────────────────┘
     Creates:                Creates:               Executes:               Creates:
     shared.md              parallel-plan.md      parallel-plan.md        report.md

If parallel-plan.md doesn't exist, this feature was not planned using the workflow. The report can still be generated but will have limited context.

Arguments

Target: $ARGUMENTS

Parse arguments:

  • feature-name: The name of the feature to report on (matches directory name in docs/plans/)
  • --dry-run: Show what would be created without making changes

If no feature name provided, abort with usage instructions:

Usage: /code-report [feature-name] [--dry-run]

Examples:
  /code-report user-authentication
  /code-report payment-integration --dry-run

Questions: class clarify (prerequisite failure "proceed anyway?", changed-file list request): headless (no question tool or chat turn), print the error or the missing input and stop; write no report. See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/_shared/references/question-policy.md.


Phase 0: Prerequisites Check

Step 1: Validate Prerequisites

Extract the feature name from $ARGUMENTS (first non-flag argument).

Run the prerequisites check script in Step 1, before reading planning documents:

${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/code-report/scripts/check-prerequisites.sh [feature-name]

If the script exits with error:

  • Display the error message
  • Note that the report can still be generated but with limited context
  • Ask user if they want to proceed anyway

Step 2: Verify Planning Documents

Confirm which files exist in docs/plans/[feature-name]/:

  • parallel-plan.md (strongly recommended)
  • shared.md (optional but helpful)
  • Any other planning documents

Phase 1: Gather Context

Step 3: Read Planning Documents

If they exist, read in this order:

  1. docs/plans/[feature-name]/parallel-plan.md - The implementation plan
  2. docs/plans/[feature-name]/shared.md - Architecture context
  3. Any other .md files in docs/plans/[feature-name]/

Step 4: Identify Changed Files

Use one of these methods to identify what changed:

Method 1: Git diff (if working in git repo)

git diff --name-status HEAD

Method 2: From parallel-plan.md

Extract all files from:

  • "Files to Create" sections
  • "Files to Modify" sections

Method 3: Ask user

If neither method works, ask user to list the files that changed.

Step 5: Read Changed Files

Read a representative sample of changed files to understand:

  • What features were implemented
  • How the implementation works
  • Any notable patterns or approaches used

Don't read every file - focus on key files that demonstrate the changes.


Phase 2: Generate Report

Step 6: Check for Dry Run Mode

If --dry-run is present in $ARGUMENTS:

Display:

# Dry Run: Code Report for [feature-name]

## Report Location

docs/plans/[feature-name]/report.md

## Report Structure

- Overview: 2-4 sentence summary
- Files Changed: List with descriptions
- New Features: Feature list with descriptions
- Additional Notes: Important information and concerns
- E2E Tests To Perform: Testing guidance for QA

## Context Available

- parallel-plan.md: [found/not found]
- shared.md: [found/not found]
- Git changes: [available/not available]

## Next Steps

Remove --dry-run flag to generate the report.

STOP HERE - do not write files.

Step 7: Load Report Template

Read the report template:

cat ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/code-report/templates/report-structure.md

Step 8: Generate Report Content

Create docs/plans/[feature-name]/report.md with the following sections:

Frontmatter

---
title: [Feature Name] Implementation Report
date: [current date in mm/dd/yyyy format]
original-plan: docs/plans/[feature-name]/parallel-plan.md
---

Overview Section

Write 2-4 sentences providing:

  • What was implemented
  • High-level approach taken
  • Key architectural decisions made

Keep it information-dense and focused on the "what" and "why".

Files Changed Section

List all files that were created or modified, grouped by type:

## Files Changed

### Created

- `/path/to/new/file.ext`: Brief description of what this file does

### Modified

- `/path/to/existing/file.ext`: Brief description of changes made

New Features Section

List each feature with:

  • Short descriptive name
  • One-sentence description of the feature and how it works

Include all features, both new and changed.

## New Features

**Feature Name**: Brief description of what it does and how it works.

**Another Feature**: Description with implementation approach.

Additional Notes Section

Include:

  • Important implementation details
  • Concerns or technical debt
  • Dependencies added
  • Configuration changes required
  • Migration steps if needed
  • Performance considerations

Be thorough but concise. Only include information that's important for someone maintaining this code.

E2E Tests Section

Provide specific testing guidance:

  • What functionality to test
  • How to test it (step-by-step)
  • Expected results
  • Edge cases to verify

Write this for QA so they know exactly what to test.

## E2E Tests To Perform

### Test 1: [Test Name]

**Steps:**

1. Step one
2. Step two
3. Step three

**Expected Result:**
Describe what should happen

**Edge Cases:**

- Edge case to test

Phase 3: Validation & Summary

Step 9: Validate Report

Check that the report includes:

  • Frontmatter with title, date, original-plan reference
  • Overview section (2-4 sentences)
  • Files Changed with all modified/created files listed
  • New Features with descriptions
  • Additional Notes (even if brief)
  • E2E Tests with actionable test cases

Step 10: Display Summary

Provide completion summary:

# Code Report Generated

## Location

docs/plans/[feature-name]/report.md

## Report Contents

### Overview

[First sentence of overview]

### Statistics

- **Files Created**: [count]
- **Files Modified**: [count]
- **Features Documented**: [count]
- **Test Cases**: [count]

## What's Included

- Implementation overview
- Complete file change list
- Feature descriptions
- Additional notes and concerns
- End-to-end testing guidance

## Next Steps

1. Review the report: docs/plans/[feature-name]/report.md
2. Share with QA team for testing guidance
3. Use as reference for documentation updates
4. Commit alongside implementation changes

Quality Standards

Report Quality Checklist

The report must have:

  • Clear, concise overview (2-4 sentences)
  • All changed files listed with descriptions
  • Features described with implementation approach
  • Relevant additional notes (concerns, dependencies, migrations)
  • Actionable E2E test guidance for QA
  • Professional tone suitable for team documentation

Content Quality Guidelines

Overview

  • Information-dense, not fluffy
  • Focus on what was done and why
  • Mention key architectural decisions

Files Changed

  • Group by created vs modified
  • Brief but useful descriptions
  • Use relative paths from project root

New Features

  • Clear feature names
  • One-sentence descriptions
  • Include "how it works" context

Additional Notes

  • Only include important information
  • Be honest about concerns or technical debt
  • Mention any required follow-up work

E2E Tests

  • Specific, actionable test cases
  • Step-by-step instructions
  • Clear expected results
  • Don't forget edge cases

Important Notes

  • You are the documenter - accurately capture what was implemented
  • Be concise but complete - every section should add value
  • Write for the team - QA will use the tests, future devs will reference the notes
  • Link to the plan - frontmatter should reference the original parallel-plan.md
  • Current date - use the actual current date in mm/dd/yyyy format