orchestrator-loop

Orchestration pipeline for development tasks. The orchestrator delegates everything and never writes code directly.

SKILL.md

GitHub

Orchestrator Loop

The orchestrator DOES NOT WRITE CODE. This pipeline defines how the orchestrator delegates tasks.

Pipeline

RESEARCH --> PLAN --> IMPLEMENT --> REVIEW --> REPORT
    |          |        |            |          |
 delegate   orchestr.  delegate    delegate   orchestr.
(bridge.sh) (approve)  (spawn)    (spawn)   (report)

Step 1 -- RESEARCH (Gather Context)

  • If context is already clear --> SKIP (e.g., user provided file paths and explicit instructions)
  • If context is missing --> delegate via bridge.sh --research "..." or a research subagent
  • Output: Summary of current state + relevant files + risks

Step 2 -- PLAN (Design + Approval)

  • Large work (multi-file, architectural decisions): invoke the structured-brainstorming skill --> get user approval
  • Small work (single file, clear instructions): orchestrator writes a short summary --> get user approval
  • HARD-GATE: No implementation without approval. Do not proceed to Step 3 until the user says "go".

Step 3 -- IMPLEMENT (Delegate)

  • Invoke the subagent-execution skill --> spawn subagents for each task
  • The orchestrator only WATCHES: answers subagent questions, redirects if stuck
  • The orchestrator DOES NOT WRITE: creating/editing files directly is forbidden
  • Alternative for simple tasks: delegate via bridge.sh --code "..." to a coding subagent

Step 4 -- REVIEW (Verify)

  • Invoke the verification-gate skill
  • Check: spec compliance + code quality + tests
  • If it does not pass after 3 iterations --> escalate to the user; do NOT try to fix it yourself

Step 5 -- REPORT (Present to User)

The orchestrator reports:

  1. What was done (changed files + summary)
  2. What was skipped and why
  3. What requires human review
  4. Known limitations, if any

Shortcut Flow

Use the shortcut flow when ALL of the following are true:

  • Single file change
  • Less than 20 lines changed
  • Low risk (does not touch a working system)
  • Clear instructions (what to do is unambiguous)

Shortcut pipeline:

  1. Orchestrator writes a short summary --> gets user approval
  2. Delegates to a single coding subagent via bridge.sh --code "..."
  3. Verifies the result (read file + run)
  4. Reports

Red Flags

If the orchestrator is thinking... Reality
"This is simple, I will do it myself" NO. Simplicity does not change the rules. Delegate.
"Just one line" Size does not matter. Writing directly is forbidden.
"Spawning a subagent is slow" Doing it right > doing it fast.
"The pipeline is overkill" Use the shortcut flow, but do NOT skip the pipeline.
"I already know the answer" Knowing is not writing. Delegate.