rca-ci

Root cause analysis from CI logs - systematic investigation when only CI output is available

SKILL.md

GitHub

RCA-CI: Root Cause Analysis from CI Logs

Systematic root cause analysis when you only have access to CI logs and artifacts.

Context-Safe Execution (MANDATORY)

CI logs are the single largest source of context pollution. A single gh run view --log-failed can dump thousands of lines into context. ALL CI log analysis MUST happen in subagents.

# Session-scoped log directory
# Works in both Claude Code (local) and sandbox agent (container)
export LOG_DIR="${LOG_DIR:-${WORKSPACE_DIR:-/tmp}/rossoctl-rca}"
mkdir -p "$LOG_DIR"

Rules:

  1. Download CI logs to files — never let gh run view --log-failed output hit the context
  2. ALL log analysis in subagents — use Task(subagent_type='Explore') to read and analyze
  3. The subagent reads the file, finds errors, and returns a concise summary
  4. Main context only sees: file paths, exit codes, and subagent summaries

rca:ci vs rca:hypershift

Aspect rca:ci rca:hypershift
Access CI logs only Full cluster access
Data Static artifacts Live state + logs
When CI failure, no cluster Have running cluster
Escalate → rca:hypershift if need live debugging N/A

When to Use

  • CI pipeline failed
  • No HyperShift cluster available
  • Need to understand failure before deciding on fix
  • Before using tdd:ci to iterate on fixes

Auto-approved: gh commands for downloading CI logs and artifacts are auto-approved. Analysis output is saved to /tmp/rossoctl/rca/.

RCA Workflow

flowchart TD
    START(["/rca:ci"]) --> P1["Phase 1: Gather"]:::rca
    P1 --> P2["Phase 2: Isolate"]:::rca
    P2 --> P3["Phase 3: Hypothesize"]:::rca
    P3 --> P4["Phase 4: Verify"]:::rca
    P4 --> RESULT{"Conclusive?"}
    RESULT -->|Yes| P5["Phase 5: Document"]:::rca
    RESULT -->|No| ESC["Escalate to rca:hypershift"]:::rca
    P5 --> TDD["tdd:ci"]:::tdd

    classDef rca fill:#FF5722,stroke:#333,color:white
    classDef tdd fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#333,color:white

Follow this diagram as the workflow.

Phase 1: Gather CI Artifacts

# Get failed run ID (small output, OK inline)
gh run list --status failure --limit 5
# Download logs to session-scoped directory
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed > $LOG_DIR/ci-run-<run-id>.log 2>&1; echo "EXIT:$?"
# View in browser (minimal context — just prints URL)
gh run view <run-id> --web
# Download all artifacts to session-scoped directory
gh run download <run-id> -D $LOG_DIR/artifacts

Analyze logs in subagent — use Task(subagent_type='Explore') to read $LOG_DIR/ci-run-<run-id>.log.

Phase 2: Isolate the Failure

Do this in a subagent — use Task(subagent_type='Explore') with instructions to:

  1. Use Grep with context (-C 3) on $LOG_DIR/ci-run-<run-id>.log — do NOT read the whole file
  2. Search patterns: FAILED|ERROR|AssertionError|assert.*False with head_limit: 30
  3. If grep finds matches, read only those specific line ranges for context
  4. Return: first error, test name, assertion message, and 2-3 lines of surrounding context

Error Chain Analysis

Work backwards from the failure:

  1. What test failed?
  2. What assertion failed?
  3. What was the actual vs expected value?
  4. What API/operation produced the wrong result?
  5. What component is responsible?

Phase 3: Hypothesize Causes

Common CI Failure Categories

Category Signs Check
Timing "timeout", flaky results Race conditions, slow startup
Config "not found", "invalid" Missing env vars, wrong paths
Auth "401", "403", "unauthorized" Token issues, client config
Network "connection refused", "timeout" Service not ready, DNS
State Works locally, fails CI Order dependency, cleanup
Resource "OOM", "evicted" Memory/CPU limits

Hypothesis Template

## Hypothesis 1: [Brief description]
- **Likelihood**: High/Medium/Low
- **Evidence needed**: [What to look for]
- **Found**: [Yes/No/Partial]
- **Conclusion**: [Confirmed/Eliminated/Inconclusive]

Phase 4: Verify with Evidence

Search Patterns

# Auth issues
grep -i "oauth\|token\|401\|403\|unauthorized" logs/*.txt

# Timing issues
grep -i "timeout\|timed out\|deadline\|retry" logs/*.txt

# Connection issues
grep -i "connection\|refused\|unreachable\|dns" logs/*.txt

# Resource issues
grep -i "oom\|memory\|evict\|limit" logs/*.txt

Cross-Reference

  • Compare with last successful run
  • Check if same test passed before
  • Look for recent code changes in affected area

Phase 5: Document Findings

## Root Cause Analysis

**Failure**: [Test name / description]
**Run ID**: [gh run id]

### Root Cause
[Clear statement of what caused the failure]

### Evidence
1. [Log line / artifact showing the issue]
2. [Supporting evidence]

### Contributing Factors
- [Any secondary causes]

### Fix
[Proposed solution]

### Prevention
[How to prevent recurrence]

CVE Check Before Publishing Findings

Before posting RCA findings to any public destination (issue comment, PR comment, etc.):

If the root cause involves a dependency bug, unexpected behavior, or version issue:

  1. Invoke cve:scan to check if this is a known CVE
  2. If a CVE is found → invoke cve:brainstorm BEFORE documenting findings publicly
  3. Rewrite RCA documentation to use neutral language (no CVE IDs, no vulnerability descriptions)
  4. Report the CVE through proper channels (see cve:brainstorm)

Example neutral RCA wording:

Root Cause: Incompatibility with <package> <version>.
Fix: Bump to <version> which resolves the behavior.

NOT:

Root Cause: CVE-2026-XXXXX in <package> allows remote code execution.

Escalation to rca:hypershift

Escalate when:

  • Logs are insufficient to determine root cause
  • Need to inspect live state (secrets, configs, pod status)
  • Need to reproduce with debugging enabled
  • Multiple hypotheses remain after log analysis
rca:ci inconclusive? → Create cluster → rca:hypershift

gh CLI Flag Reference (use ONLY these — do NOT invent flags)

gh run list

Valid: --branch <name>, --status <state>, --event <type>, --limit <n>, --workflow <name>, --json <fields>, --commit <sha> INVALID (do NOT use): --head, --head-ref, --pr, --pull-request To filter by PR: use gh pr checks <pr-number> or --branch <pr-branch-name>

gh run view <run_id>

Valid: --log, --log-failed, --job <id>, --web Always redirect large output: gh run view <id> --log-failed > $LOG_DIR/ci.log

gh pr

  • gh pr checks <number> — CI status for a specific PR
  • gh pr view <number> --json checks — JSON CI check data
  • gh pr list --state open|closed|merged

If a flag fails

Run gh <command> --help to see valid flags. Do NOT guess.

Quick Reference

Task Command
List failed runs gh run list --status failure --limit 5
CI for specific PR gh pr checks <pr-number>
View failed logs gh run view <id> --log-failed
Download artifacts gh run download <id>
Open in browser gh run view <id> --web

Related Skills

  • rca:hypershift - RCA with live cluster access
  • tdd:ci - Fix iteration after RCA
  • superpowers:systematic-debugging - General debugging approach
  • cve:scan - CVE scanning (check if root cause is a known CVE)
  • cve:brainstorm - Disclosure planning (if CVE found during RCA)