codexkit-workshop-facilitator
Design and facilitate structured workshops using Design Thinking and Liberating Structures. Produces detailed agendas with time blocks, facilitation notes, participant materials, and retrospective tem
SKILL.mdskills/codexkit-workshop-facilitator/SKILL.md
GitHubWorkshop Facilitator
When to Use
- When planning a brainstorming or ideation workshop
- When facilitating strategy or planning sessions
- When running collaborative problem-solving sessions
- When designing team-building or training workshops
Procedure
Step 1 — Workshop Design Brief
| Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Objective | What must be achieved by the end? |
| Participants | Who, how many, their roles |
| Duration | Total time available |
| Format | In-person / Virtual / Hybrid |
| Pre-work | What participants should prepare |
| Outputs | Tangible deliverables from the session |
Step 2 — Activity Selection
Match activities to objectives:
| Objective | Activity | Time | Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generate ideas | Crazy 8s, Brainwriting | 20 min | Individual → Group |
| Prioritize | Dot voting, 2×2 Matrix | 15 min | Group |
| Explore problems | 5 Whys, Fishbone | 25 min | Small group |
| Align on vision | Future Backwards | 30 min | Full group |
| Build consensus | 1-2-4-All (Liberating Structures) | 15 min | Progressive |
| Define actions | RACI + Action planning | 20 min | Group |
| Reflect | Plus/Delta, Sailboat retro | 15 min | Individual → Group |
Step 3 — Agenda with Time Blocks
Build the full agenda:
| Time | Duration | Activity | Method | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09:00 | 10 min | Welcome & check-in | Round robin | None |
| 09:10 | 5 min | Set objectives & ground rules | Facilitator | Slide |
| 09:15 | 20 min | Problem framing | 1-2-4-All | Sticky notes |
| 09:35 | 25 min | Ideation | Crazy 8s | Paper templates |
| 10:00 | 10 min | ☕ Break | — | — |
| 10:10 | 20 min | Share & cluster | Affinity mapping | Wall/Miro |
| 10:30 | 15 min | Prioritize | Dot voting (3 dots each) | Dot stickers |
| 10:45 | 20 min | Action planning | RACI template | Worksheet |
| 11:05 | 10 min | Retro & close | Plus/Delta | Cards |
Rules:
- Never schedule >90 min without a break
- Alternate individual → pair → group activities
- End 10 min early for retro, never skip it
Step 4 — Facilitation Notes
For each activity, prepare:
- Setup instructions — how to explain it
- Timing cues — when to move to next phase
- Energy watch — how to re-energize if energy drops
- Divergence/Convergence — clearly label which mode
- Silent before spoken — always start with individual reflection
Step 5 — Participant Materials
Prepare and distribute:
- Pre-read or context document
- Templates / worksheets
- Miro board (virtual) or wall setup (in-person)
- Ground rules card
Step 6 — Post-Workshop
- Photo/screenshot all outputs
- Synthesize into action items within 24 hours
- Send summary + actions to all participants
- Run Plus/Delta retro on the workshop format itself
Inputs
| Input | Required | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Workshop objective | Yes | What must be achieved |
| Participants | Yes | Who, how many |
| Duration | Yes | Hours available |
| Format | Yes | In-person / Virtual / Hybrid |
| Context | Recommended | Background reading for participants |
Output
## Workshop Plan — [Workshop Name]
### Overview
**Objective:** Generate and prioritize Q3 product roadmap ideas
**Participants:** Product (4), Engineering (4), Design (2) — 10 people
**Duration:** 2.5 hours | **Format:** Virtual (Miro)
### Agenda
[Full time-blocked agenda with activities and materials]
### Facilitator Guide
[Setup instructions and timing cues per activity]
### Participant Pre-Work
- Review Q2 metrics dashboard (link)
- Bring 3 customer pain points from your domain
### Materials
- Miro board: [link]
- Priority matrix template: [link]
Definition of Done
- Clear objective and outputs defined
- Agenda time-blocked with breaks
- Activities matched to objectives
- Facilitation notes for each activity
- Participant materials prepared
- Post-workshop action plan template ready
Quality Criteria
- All placeholder sections are filled with domain-specific content
- Structure follows the relevant industry standard or framework
- Language matches target audience (technical / executive / legal)
- Output is ready for review — not a rough draft requiring major rework
Verification (4C)
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Does the draft structure follow the stated framework or industry standard? |
| Completeness | Are all required sections present with substantive (not placeholder) content? |
| Context-fit | Does tone, detail level, and terminology match the intended audience? |
| Consequence | If sent to the intended recipient without further editing, what would fail? |
Edge Cases
- No existing template for this type — Use the closest available template and document all customizations made.
- Stakeholder requirements conflict — Flag conflicts explicitly in the draft. Do not silently choose one requirement over another.
- Output required in multiple formats — Produce the canonical format first, then derive others. Note any formatting limitations.
Changelog
- v1.0.0 — Initial release