Supplier Evaluation Scorecard
When to Use
- During quarterly or annual supplier performance reviews
- When selecting vendors for new sourcing decisions
- When consolidating or rationalizing the supplier base
- When a supplier's performance triggers a review
Procedure
Step 1 — Define Evaluation Criteria
| Criterion |
Weight |
Measurement |
| Quality |
30% |
Defect rate, inspection pass rate, returns |
| Delivery |
25% |
On-time delivery %, lead time variance |
| Cost |
20% |
Price competitiveness, total cost of ownership |
| Responsiveness |
15% |
Communication speed, issue resolution time |
| Sustainability |
10% |
ESG compliance, certifications, carbon footprint |
Adjust weights based on industry and strategic priorities.
Step 2 — Score Each Criterion
| Score |
Level |
Description |
| 5 |
Excellent |
Exceeds expectations consistently |
| 4 |
Good |
Meets expectations with occasional excellence |
| 3 |
Acceptable |
Meets minimum standards |
| 2 |
Below Average |
Frequent issues, requires monitoring |
| 1 |
Unacceptable |
Consistent failures, action required |
Step 3 — Calculate Weighted Total
Weighted Score = Σ (Score × Weight)
Step 4 — Tier Classification
| Weighted Score |
Tier |
Relationship Strategy |
| 4.5–5.0 |
Strategic |
Long-term partnership, innovation collaboration |
| 3.5–4.4 |
Preferred |
Stable relationship, volume commitment |
| 2.5–3.4 |
Approved |
Transactional, competitive bidding |
| < 2.5 |
Conditional |
Improvement plan required, phase-out risk |
Step 5 — Action Plan
For Conditional and low-Approved suppliers:
- Issue corrective action request (CAR)
- Define improvement targets with timeline
- Schedule re-evaluation in 90 days
- Identify backup supplier if no improvement
Inputs
| Input |
Required |
Format |
| Supplier name and category |
Yes |
Text |
| Performance data |
Yes |
Metrics per criterion |
| Contract/spend data |
Recommended |
Annual spend, contract terms |
| Previous evaluation |
Recommended |
Prior scorecard if available |
Output
## Supplier Evaluation — [Supplier Name] — [Period]
### Scorecard
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Weighted |
|-----------|--------|-------|----------|
| Quality | 30% | 4 | 1.20 |
| Delivery | 25% | 3 | 0.75 |
| Cost | 20% | 4 | 0.80 |
| Responsiveness | 15% | 5 | 0.75 |
| Sustainability | 10% | 3 | 0.30 |
| **Total** | **100%** | | **3.80** |
### Tier: PREFERRED (3.80 / 5.0)
### Improvement Areas
1. Delivery: OTD dropped to 88% (target: 95%) — root cause: warehouse capacity
2. Sustainability: No ISO 14001 certification yet — expected Q3
### Action Plan
| Action | Owner | Deadline |
|--------|-------|----------|
| Improve OTD to 95% | Supplier ops team | 90 days |
| Submit ISO 14001 timeline | Supplier quality | 60 days |
| Re-evaluate | Procurement | Q3 |
Definition of Done
Examples
Prompt
Evaluate our packaging supplier FastPack Ltd for Q1.
Quality: 96% pass rate (4/5), Delivery: 88% OTD (3/5), Cost: competitive (4/5),
Responsiveness: excellent (5/5), Sustainability: no ISO 14001 (3/5).
Generate the scorecard and improvement plan.
Quality Criteria
Verification (4C)
| Check |
Question |
| Correctness |
Are formulas, aggregations, and statistical methods applied correctly? |
| Completeness |
Does the analysis cover all requested metrics and time ranges? |
| Context-fit |
Are the chosen metrics relevant to the business question being answered? |
| Consequence |
If this data were used for a decision today, what blind spots remain? |
Edge Cases
- Missing or incomplete data — Document gaps and their potential impact on conclusions. Provide ranges instead of point estimates.
- Outliers skewing results — Report with and without outliers. Document the decision to include or exclude.
- Changing data definitions mid-period — Split analysis at the change boundary and note the schema difference.
Changelog