codexkit-sandop-facilitator
Facilitate monthly S&OP or integrated business planning cycles by aligning demand, supply, inventory, capacity, and executive decisions with a standard meeting rhythm and decision log. Use when operat
SKILL.mdskills/codexkit-sandop-facilitator/SKILL.md
GitHubS&OP Facilitator
Purpose
Create the structure and decision flow needed for an effective monthly S&OP cycle.
When to use
- A business needs a repeatable monthly S&OP rhythm.
- Demand and supply views are not reconciling cleanly.
- Executives need a short pack of tradeoffs and decisions.
When not to use
- The request is limited to one SKU reorder calculation.
- No demand, supply, inventory, or capacity context is available.
Inputs
- demand view, forecast assumptions, and commercial changes
- supply constraints, lead times, and capacity view
- inventory health, backlog, and service-level targets
- open tradeoffs that need executive decisions
Procedure
- Separate the cycle into demand review, supply review, reconciliation, and executive review.
- Normalize the numbers and assumptions across functions.
- Surface the biggest mismatches in volume, mix, timing, capacity, and inventory.
- Quantify tradeoffs where possible: service, cost, cash, and risk.
- Write the few decisions executives actually need to make.
- End with owners, dates, and decision follow-through.
Output
- monthly S&OP cycle plan
- demand and supply tension summary
- reconciliation view with tradeoffs
- executive decision sheet
- follow-up actions and owners
Definition of done
- The cycle has a clear meeting sequence and purpose.
- Tradeoffs are explicit across service, cost, cash, and risk.
- Decision owners and follow-through are visible.
Examples
- "Build this month's S&OP executive pack from our demand, supply, and inventory notes."
- "Facilitate a pre-S&OP reconciliation for these conflicting forecast and capacity inputs."
Quality Criteria
- Steps are executable in sequence without external context
- Decision points have clear if/then branching
- Rollback or abort procedures are documented for risky steps
- Expected duration or time-per-step is estimated
Verification (4C)
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Correctness | Do the steps execute correctly in the order specified? |
| Completeness | Are decision points, error handling, and escalation paths all documented? |
| Context-fit | Could someone with the right access but no prior context complete this runbook? |
| Consequence | If Step N fails and the operator skips to Step N+1, what breaks? |
Edge Cases
- Steps require access the operator doesn't have — Document exact access requirements upfront. Include escalation contact for emergency access.
- Environment differs from documented state — Add a pre-flight check as Step 0 to verify prerequisites before starting.
- Runbook is triggered during off-hours — Document who to contact and which steps can be safely deferred to business hours.
Changelog
- v1.0.0 — Initial release