design

Overview

Structured design skill that front-loads design decisions before implementation. Produces a DESIGN.md document and, optionally, multiple visual approaches for comparison.

When to Use

Run before implementation, while the direction is still open. consult settles one feature, variants compares directions side by side, and system sets the tokens and components the other two draw from.

Subcommand Routing

Invocation	Action
/design or /design consult <description>	Design consultation (default)
/design variants	Generate multiple visual approaches
/design system	Scaffold a design system or component library

If no subcommand is given, default to consult.

Process

1. Route the invocation per Subcommand Routing.
2. Run that subcommand's Steps in order.
3. Write or update DESIGN.md, the per-feature file for consult and variants, the project file for system.
4. Present for approval and wait for the user before any implementation.

---

consult

Research design patterns in the ecosystem, propose a component hierarchy, and produce a DESIGN.md with decisions and rationale.

When to use

• Before building a new UI feature or component.
• When evaluating multiple visual or UX approaches.
• When establishing a design direction for a new project.

Arguments

• No arguments: interactive mode. Ask what needs to be designed.
• <description>: start consultation with the given feature or component.
• --research: include competitive research, search for how other products solve the same problem.

Steps

1. Clarify requirements. Ask one question at a time:

   • What is the user trying to accomplish?
   • What are the inputs and outputs?
   • What states exist such as empty, loading, error, success, or partial?
   • What are the accessibility requirements?
   • Is there an existing design system or component library to follow?

2. Research, if --research or the problem is non-trivial. Run in parallel:

   • Search for similar UI patterns in the project's existing components.
   • Search for established patterns in the component library, such as shadcn/ui, MUI, or Ant Design, if one is in use.
   • If --research: search the web for how other products handle this pattern.

3. Detect the project's design foundation. Read in parallel:

   • tailwind.config.* or CSS custom properties for design tokens.
   • package.json for UI library dependencies.
   • Existing components for naming and structure patterns.

4. Propose the design. Cover each dimension:

   Dimension	What to specify
   Component hierarchy	Parent, children, composition points
   Layout	Grid/flex strategy, responsive breakpoints
   Typography	Font sizes, weights, line heights for each element
   Color	Semantic colors from the existing palette, not hardcoded values
   Spacing	Margin/padding following the project's scale (4px/8px grid)
   States	Empty, loading, error, success, disabled, hover, focus, active
   Accessibility	ARIA roles, keyboard navigation, screen reader announcements
   Animation	Transitions, duration, easing. Respect prefers-reduced-motion
   Responsiveness	Mobile-first breakpoints and layout changes

5. Write the per-feature DESIGN.md using the canonical 8-section schema. Save it in the active plan folder, <root>/plans/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/DESIGN.md per rules/project-workspace.md, or at docs/design/<feature-slug>.md when the project already tracks design docs there. Never write it to the project root: the root DESIGN.md is the project-level document system owns, and a feature file written there overwrites it. Sections must appear in this order. Missing a section is a defect.

   # Design: <feature name>
   
   ## 1. Context
   <What is the surrounding situation? What triggered this design? What does the reader need to know to understand the rest?>
   
   ## 2. Goals
   <What this design must achieve. Measurable when possible.>
   
   ## 3. Non-Goals
   <What this design explicitly does not address. Bounds the scope.>
   
   ## 4. Constraints
   <Technical, product, regulatory, time, or resource limits that shaped the design.>
   
   ## 5. Options Considered
   <At least two alternatives, each with trade-offs. Includes the option that was rejected.>
   
   | Option | Pros | Cons | Rejected because |
   |--------|------|------|-----------------|
   | A | ... | ... | (chosen) |
   | B | ... | ... | ... |
   
   ## 6. Decision
   <The chosen approach. Component hierarchy, layout, tokens, states, accessibility, animation, responsiveness.>
   
   ### Component Hierarchy
   ### Layout
   ### Design Tokens Used
   ### States
   | State | Visual treatment | Content |
   |-------|-----------------|---------|
   | Empty | ... | ... |
   | Loading | ... | ... |
   | Error | ... | ... |
   | Success | ... | ... |
   
   ### Accessibility
   <ARIA, keyboard, screen reader behavior>
   
   ## 7. Consequences
   <What follows from the decision. Both positive outcomes and downsides accepted.>
   
   ## 8. Open Questions
   <Anything unresolved that needs validation, user input, or follow-up. Empty if none.>
   

6. Run the 5-dimension self-critique. Before presenting, score the draft on each lens. State the score, the reasoning, and any fix made.

   Lens	Question
   Clarity	Could a reader unfamiliar with the project follow this without asking?
   Completeness	Are all 8 sections present? Every state covered? Every option weighed?
   Feasibility	Can this be built with the project's current stack and team?
   Reversibility	If this design proves wrong, how hard is it to undo? Flag one-way doors.
   Blast radius	What breaks if this design is wrong? Who is affected, and how widely?

   If any lens scores below 7 of 10, fix the gap before presenting. Document the score line in DESIGN.md under "Open Questions" only when the gap is acknowledged but deferred.

7. Present for approval. Wait for user feedback before implementation begins.

---

variants

Generate multiple design approaches for the same requirement and present them for comparison.

When to use

• When the design direction is unclear.
• When stakeholders need to choose between approaches.
• After /design consult when the user wants to see options.

Arguments

• No arguments: use the most recent per-feature DESIGN.md from step 5 of consult for context.
• <description>: generate variants for the described feature.
• --count <N>: number of variants (default: 3, max: 5).

Steps

1. Read context. Load the per-feature DESIGN.md if it exists, plus the project root DESIGN.md for tokens and rules, or ask for the requirement.

2. Generate N distinct approaches. Each variant must differ meaningfully in at least one major dimension:

   • Layout strategy. Cards vs list vs table vs timeline
   • Information density. Minimal vs detailed
   • Interaction model. Inline editing vs modal vs page navigation
   • Visual style such as compact vs spacious, or flat vs layered

3. Present comparison:

   Dimension	Variant A	Variant B	Variant C
   Layout	...	...	...
   Interaction	...	...	...
   Complexity	...	...	...
   Accessibility	...	...	...
   Performance	...	...	...
   Mobile behavior	...	...	...

4. User picks. Update the per-feature DESIGN.md with the chosen direction and rationale for the choice.

---

system

Scaffold a design system or extend an existing component library with new tokens, components, or patterns.

When to use

• When starting a new project that needs a design foundation.
• When adding a new category of components to an existing system.
• When standardizing ad-hoc styles into a system.

Arguments

• No arguments: audit existing design tokens and suggest improvements.
• <component-type>: scaffold a new component type, such as button, card, dialog, table, or form.

Steps

1. Audit existing system. Read in parallel:

   • tailwind.config.* for existing tokens.
   • CSS/SCSS files for custom properties.
   • Existing components for patterns.
   • Project root DESIGN.md if one exists.

2. Identify gaps. Compare against the project's needs:

   • Missing semantic color tokens.
   • Inconsistent spacing usage.
   • Components using hardcoded values instead of tokens.
   • Missing dark mode support.

3. Propose additions. For each gap:

   • Token name and value.
   • Where it applies.
   • Migration path for existing hardcoded values.

4. Scaffold project DESIGN.md when missing. Apply the canonical schema from standards/design-md-template.md: mission, brand, style foundations, accessibility, writing tone, do/don't rules, component expectations, quality gates. The per-feature design docs from the consult subcommand are separate from this project-level document.

5. Present for approval. Propose changes to config files and suggest /plan scaffold component <name> for new components.

Rules

• Design decisions must reference the project's existing design tokens and component library. Never propose arbitrary values.
• Every design must address all states: empty, loading, error, success. Forgetting states is the most common design gap.
• Accessibility is not optional. Every design must specify keyboard navigation, ARIA roles, and screen reader behavior.
• Color choices must pass WCAG AA contrast ratios. Use the project's semantic color tokens, not raw hex values.
• DESIGN.md is permanent. It records WHY decisions were made, not just WHAT was decided.
• Never generate production code during design consultation. This skill produces decisions and specifications, not implementation.
• When the project uses a specific component library like shadcn/ui or MUI, use its component vocabulary and patterns. Do not invent parallel abstractions.

Common Rationalizations

• "The happy path is the design, the other states are details": a design without empty, loading, and error states ships a broken screen. Fill the States table for every state.
• "#3b82f6 is close to the brand blue": a raw hex bypasses the token scale and dark mode. Name the semantic token.
• "Option B was obviously wrong, so listing it is padding": the Options Considered table needs at least two rows with the reason the loser lost.
• "A quick component sketch will help": consultation produces decisions, and code waits for approval. Hand off to /plan scaffold component <name>.
• "The library lacks this exact component, so add a custom one": use the library's vocabulary and compose from its primitives first.

Red Flags

• Stop and ask one question when the user's goal, inputs, or states are unknown after reading the code.
• Stop and fix the draft when any self-critique lens scores below 7 of 10.
• Stop and swap to a token when the draft names a color, spacing, or font size absent from the project's tokens.
• Stop and regenerate when two variants differ in no major dimension from step 2 of variants.

Verification

• The per-feature DESIGN.md exists outside the project root with all 8 sections in schema order, Options Considered has at least two rows, and the project root DESIGN.md, when present, is unchanged by consult and variants.
• The States table covers empty, loading, error, and success, and Accessibility names ARIA roles, keyboard behavior, and screen reader announcements.
• The self-critique scores for all five lenses appear in the presented output.
• git status lists no new source files besides DESIGN.md and, for system, proposed config changes.
• The user approved the design, or chose a variant, before the run ended.

Related skills

• /review design -- Audit an existing implementation against design quality standards.
• /plan scaffold component -- Generate component boilerplate from project patterns.
• /plan -- Plan the implementation after design decisions are made.