Goal

• Change text with recognizable AI mannerisms (hedging, dramatic pivots, cliched transitions). Clean up AI-written content that is factually correct but flat

What This Skill Preserves

• Author's opinions, arguments, and claims
• Document structure and organization
• Paragraph and section order
• Core meaning and facts
• Intentional stylistic choices (fragments, unconventional punctuation, etc.)

Workflow

Core Principles

• Edit, don't rewrite. Clean up pattern slop, keep the voice, opinions, structure, and meaning
• Apply systematically: check all 19 rules below. Skip a rule only if it does not apply
• Use judgment on conflicts. If breaking a rule serves the writing (e.g., a well-placed em dash for effect), keep it
• Change nothing else: no reordered paragraphs, added ideas, rephrased core arguments, or altered facts

Pattern Checklist

Scan for these AI markers before applying detailed rules:

• Overused Words and Jargon
  • Grandiose: "vital", "pivotal", "groundbreaking", "robust", "comprehensive", "nuanced", "multifaceted", "transformative"
  • AI vocabulary: "delve", "leverage" (verb), "reimagine", "empower", "unpack", "synergy"
• Filler and Hedges
  • "It's worth noting that", "It's important to remember", "It should be noted", "Interestingly enough"
  • "Something we've observed", "This is where X really shines"
• Theatrical Transitions and Pivots
  • Throat-clearing: "Let's dive in", "Let's unpack", "In this article, we'll"
  • Dramatic pivots: "But here's the thing", "Here's the catch", "Here's what most people miss"
  • Overused connectors: "Furthermore", "Moreover", "Additionally", "In addition to the above"
  • Rhetorical openers: "So what does this mean for you?", "Why does this matter?"
• Structural Patterns
  • Gift-wrapped endings: "In summary", "In conclusion", "Ultimately", "At the end of the day", "Moving forward"
  • Exhaustive lists: 7-10 items when 3-4 would suffice
  • Passive voice clusters: 2+ passive sentences in a row
  • Corrective antithesis: "Not X. But Y." setup-payoff constructions
• Meta-Language and Vagueness
  • Meta-verbs: "highlights", "underscores", "emphasizes", "showcases", "illustrates"
  • Vague attribution: "some experts say", "widely covered", "significant attention"
  • Copy-paste metaphors: same metaphor repeated word-for-word 3+ times

Rules

Rule 1: Em Dashes

• Remove excessive em dashes (—)
• Rewrite with commas, full stops, or a restructured sentence
• One or two in a long piece is fine. Three or more is a pattern worth fixing

Rule 2: Corrective Antithesis

• Remove "Not X. But Y." constructions that set up something the reader never assumed, then correct it for drama
• Bad: "This isn't because they don't trust the technology. It's because they can't predict it."
• Good: "They trust the technology fine. What they can't do is predict it."

Rule 3: Dramatic Pivot Phrases

• Remove theatrical pivots: "But here's the thing", "Here's the catch", "Here's the bind", "Here's what most people miss"
• Fold the point into the sentence
• Bad: "The patterns are valuable. But here's the bind: building a tool cost more than most could justify."
• Good: "The patterns are valuable but building a tool to capture them cost more than most could justify."

Rule 4: Soft Hedging Language

• Cut filler hedges. Just say the thing
• Remove the filler hedges listed in ## Pattern Checklist (Filler and Hedges)
• Bad: "It's worth noting that this approach has shown some promising results in certain contexts."
• Good: "This approach works."

Rule 5: Overused Transition Words

• Cut or vary "Furthermore", "Moreover", "Additionally", "In addition to the above" when chained together
• Real writers use them sparingly
• Bad: "The system is fast. Furthermore, it is reliable. Moreover, it is easy to use. Additionally, it integrates well."
• Good: "The system is fast, reliable, easy to use, and integrates without friction."

Rule 6: AI Vocabulary

• Replace words AI overuses with plain alternatives
  • "delve" -> explore, look at, examine
  • "leverage" (verb) -> use, apply, rely on
  • "robust" -> strong, solid, reliable
  • "comprehensive" -> thorough, complete, full
  • "nuanced" -> subtle, layered, specific
  • "multifaceted" -> complex, varied
  • "transformative" -> significant, major
  • "unpack" -> explain, break down
  • "reimagine" -> rethink, redesign
  • "empower" -> let, help, enable

Rule 7: Meta-Verbs

• Don't say something "highlights", "underscores", "emphasizes", "showcases", or "illustrates" a point
• Explain what it actually shows
• Bad: "This underscores the importance of clear communication."
• Good: "Clear communication matters here."

Rule 8: Passive Voice Clusters

• Flag two or more passive constructions in a row
• Rewrite at least one in active voice to restore momentum
• Bad: "The report was reviewed by the team. Errors were identified. Changes were recommended."
• Good: "The team reviewed the report, found errors, and recommended changes."

Rule 9: Rhetorical Section Openers

• Cut rhetorical questions used as transitions ("So what does this mean for you?", "Why does this matter?")
• State the answer directly, or remove it
• Bad: "So what does this mean for your team? It means you need to rethink your process."
• Good: "Your team needs to rethink its process."

Rule 10: Staccato Rhythm

• Break up runs of short, punchy sentences that stack without variation
• Combine some. Lengthen others
• Let rhythm follow the thinking, not a drumbeat
• Bad: "Now, agents act. They send emails. They modify code. They book appointments."
• Good: "Agents are starting to do real things now. They'll send an email on your behalf or update a database, sometimes without you even realizing it happened."

Rule 11: Cookie-Cutter Paragraphs

• Vary paragraph length. If every paragraph runs 3-4 sentences, split some and stretch others
• The page should look uneven, like real thinking

Rule 12: Gift-Wrapped Endings

• Remove summary conclusions that restate the article's points
• Cut the closers listed in ## Pattern Checklist (Gift-wrapped endings)
• End with something specific, human, or unresolved
• Bad: "In summary, by focusing on clear communication, consistent feedback, and mutual trust, teams can build stronger relationships."
• Good: "The best teams I've worked with never talked about trust. They just had it."

Rule 13: Throat-Clearing Intros

• Remove throat-clearing openers such as "Let's explore", "Let's dive in", and "In this article, we'll"
• Just start. The best first sentence puts the reader in the middle of something
• Bad: "In this article, we'll explore the hidden costs of micromanagement Let's dive in."
• Good: "I micromanaged someone last Tuesday."

Rule 14: Exhaustive Lists

• Trim bullet lists of 7-10 items to the 3-4 that cover the essential points
• Long lists signal AI comprehensiveness, not human judgment
• Cut the weakest items

Rule 15: Perfect Punctuation

• Don't correct every grammar "mistake" if it sounds more natural broken
  • Fragments are fine
  • Starting with "And" or "But" is fine
  • A comma splice can stay if it reads well
• If the draft has personality in its punctuation, keep it

Rule 16: Copy-Paste Metaphors

• If the same metaphor or phrase appears more than twice, vary the language
• Use a pronoun, rephrase it, or trust the reader to remember
• Never repeat a metaphor word-for-word three times
• Bad: "Trust is like a battery. When the trust battery is full... But when the trust battery runs low... To recharge the trust battery..."
• Good: "Trust is like a battery. When it's full, you barely think about it. But let it drain and suddenly every interaction needs a charger."

Rule 17: Overexplaining the Obvious

• Cut sentences that explain what the reader already understands
• If you've made a clear point, don't re-explain how it works
• Bad: "Trust is earned over time. You give people small tasks, observe how they handle them, then gradually expand their responsibilities."
• Good: "Trust is earned. Everyone knows this. The question is whether you're actually giving people the chance to earn it."

Rule 18: Generic Examples

• Flag examples that could apply to any company or product
• An example without a specific, surprising, or insider detail is filler
• Either sharpen it or cut it
• Bad: "Take Slack, for example. By focusing on seamless team communication, they transformed how modern workplaces collaborate."
• Good: "Slack solved the wrong problem brilliantly. Nobody needed another messaging app, but everyone needed a place to dump links and pretend they'd read them later."

Rule 19: Vague Attribution

• Avoid vague references like "some experts say", "widely covered", "significant attention"
• Identify the actual critic, report, study, or author when possible
• If you can't name the source, cut the claim

Save

• Save the cleaned text over the input file. Change only the text, not the format

Verification

• Confirm the file's structure, order, and meaning are unchanged
• Confirm no AI markers listed in ## Pattern Checklist remain