documentation-quality-check

Use before delivering any documentation to validate quality, accuracy, and completeness. This skill provides a checklist for reviewing all documentation deliverables to ensure they meet minimum qualit

SKILL.md

GitHub

Documentation Quality Check

Overview

This skill defines the validation checklist for all documentation. Good documentation is accurate, complete, clear, structured, and maintained. Poor documentation wastes time and causes errors.

When to Use

  • Before delivering any documentation to another agent or stakeholder
  • Before publishing documentation to shared repositories
  • After making changes to existing documentation
  • When documentation is reviewed as part of quality gates
  • Don't use when: Documentation is exploratory draft not yet for distribution

Core Procedures

Step 1: Accuracy Check

  • All technical information is correct and current
  • Examples produce stated results when followed
  • References to other documents are valid and point to correct locations
  • No outdated or deprecated information without clear marking
  • Diagrams, screenshots, and visual aids accurately represent the system

Step 2: Completeness Check

  • All intended topics are covered
  • Prerequisites and dependencies documented
  • Scope and limitations clearly stated
  • Audience-appropriate detail level (not too shallow, not too deep)
  • Known gaps or TODOs are explicitly identified

Step 3: Clarity Check

  • Writing is clear and free of jargon without explanation
  • Structure is logical and easy to navigate
  • Headings and sections are descriptive
  • Links work and point to correct destinations
  • Table of contents matches actual structure (if present)
  • No broken formatting or display issues

Step 4: Consistency Check

  • Terminology used consistently throughout
  • Formatting follows project/style standards
  • Cross-references are accurate and bidirectional
  • Code examples follow coding-standards
  • Version information matches actual document version

Step 5: Actionability Check

  • Procedures have clear step-by-step instructions
  • Expected outcomes described for each procedure
  • Troubleshooting guidance provided for common failures
  • Contact or escalation path included where relevant
  • Document has author, date, and version metadata

Quality Checklist

  • ALL accuracy checks pass
  • ALL completeness checks pass
  • ALL clarity checks pass
  • ALL consistency checks pass
  • ALL actionability checks pass
  • Documentation reviewed by second party if high-impact

Error Handling

  • Error: Technical inaccuracy discovered Response: Fix immediately, re-run all accuracy checks, note change in version history
  • Error: Documentation is incomplete Response: Complete missing sections before delivery, or clearly mark as partial with expected completion
  • Error: Examples don't work as documented Response: Fix example or fix documentation, whichever is actually correct

Cross-Team Integration

Related Skills: output-validation-checklist, source-verification, taxonomy-standards, feedback-integration Used By: Documenters, ALL agents producing documentation, especially technical writers and API documenters