pmstudio-arb

Generate an Architecture Review Board (ARB) presentation in Coco Inc's standard 11-slide format. Use when someone asks to "create an ARB deck", "architecture review presentation", "prepare for archite

SKILL.md

GitHub

ARB Review — Architecture Review Board Presentation

Purpose

Generates an 11-slide architecture review presentation following Coco Inc's standard ARB format. Used when a product needs architecture sign-off for a new instance, major integration, platform migration, or periodic review.

Process

Step 1: Read Context

Required sources (read all that exist):

  • CLAUDE.local.md — project context, architecture decisions, stakeholders, ProdID
  • PRD/*.html or PRD/*.md — requirements, NFRs, technical considerations, integrations, data model
  • Architecture/ or *Architecture*.html — existing diagrams, maps

Optional sources:

  • .sync-watch.json — project name
  • Operational/DR-Plan*.html — RTO/RPO targets (for slide 8)
  • Data/Stakeholder-Directory.* — presenter and audience names

Step 2: Ask Discovery Questions

Only ask what cannot be inferred from context:

  1. Review type? New Product / Major Change / Periodic Review / Decommission
  2. Data classification? Purple / Red / Yellow / Green (if not in PRD)
  3. Audience? Firm-level ARB / Department-level / Technical review
  4. Known constraints or mandates? (e.g., "must use existing Snowflake instance")
  5. Decision you need? Approve / Approve-with-conditions / Defer — what specifically?

Step 3: Generate 11-Slide Deck

Output: Presentations/ARB-Review-{ProductName}-{Date}.html

Self-contained HTML file with:

  • System fonts (no CDN dependencies)
  • Click/keyboard navigation between slides
  • Print CSS for PDF export
  • Mermaid.js (CDN) for architecture diagrams

Slide structure — see references/arb-format.md for section details:

# Slide Key Content
1 Title & Context Product name, ProdID, review type, date, presenters
2 Business Context Problem statement, strategic alignment, sponsor
3 Current State AS-IS architecture (Mermaid diagram), pain points
4 Proposed Architecture TO-BE architecture (Mermaid diagram), what changes
5 Data Architecture Data classification, flows, retention, residency
6 Security & Access AuthN/AuthZ, RBAC, encryption, CUECs
7 Integration Points Upstream/downstream, protocols, error handling
8 NFRs & SLAs Performance, availability, RTO/RPO, scalability
9 Risk Assessment Architecture risks, mitigations, residual acceptance
10 Implementation Plan Phases, timeline, rollback, blast radius
11 Decision Request What you need from the board, options, recommendation

Step 4: Populate Content

For each slide, pull from project sources:

  • Slide 1: Product name and ProdID from CLAUDE.local.md. Review type from Step 2. Presenters from stakeholder directory.
  • Slides 3-4: Generate Mermaid diagrams from PRD architecture section and Architecture maps. If current-state diagram exists, use it. If not, build from PRD integrations and technical considerations.
  • Slide 5: Data classification from PRD or discovery. Data flows from integrations section. Retention from NFRs.
  • Slide 6: RBAC from PRD. CUECs from operationalization section. SSO/AuthN from technical considerations.
  • Slide 7: Extract all integration points from PRD. Add protocol, frequency, error handling.
  • Slide 8: Pull NFRs directly from PRD table. RTO/RPO from DR plan if it exists.
  • Slide 9: Pull risks from PRD risk section. Add architecture-specific risks.
  • Slide 10: Pull timeline from PRD. Add rollback strategy.
  • Slide 11: Decision request from Step 2. Frame options with recommendation.

Step 5: Present for Review

Show the deck outline with key content per slide. Ask:

  • "Does this cover the right scope?"
  • "Any slides that need different emphasis?"
  • "Who are the presenters for slide 1?"

Apply feedback, then write the file.

Critical Rules

  1. Mermaid diagrams are mandatory for slides 3 and 4. Architecture reviews without diagrams fail.
  2. Data classification must be explicit. If unknown, mark as "TBD — requires classification" in red. Never assume.
  3. Slide 11 must have a clear ask. Not "please review" but "approve this architecture for production deployment" or "approve with condition: validate cascading before Phase 2."
  4. No implementation details on architecture slides. Show components, interfaces, and data flows — not code, configs, or step-by-step procedures.
  5. Keep it to 11 slides. If more content is needed, add appendix slides clearly labeled "APPENDIX" after slide 11.