audit

Perform a deep-dive review of specific accounts or transactions

SKILL.md

GitHub

Audit

Audit specific accounts or transactions for "$ARGUMENTS". Examine supporting documentation, test balances, and identify discrepancies or irregularities.

Prerequisites

None — utility skill, run anytime. More effective when ledger data is available from Phase 3 or later.

Process

  1. Define audit scope:

    • Which accounts or transaction types are being audited?
    • What period is covered?
    • What is the audit objective? (accuracy, completeness, existence, valuation, disclosure)
    • What materiality threshold applies?
  2. Gather evidence:

    • Pull account balances and transaction details from the ledger
    • Request supporting documentation (invoices, contracts, confirmations)
    • Identify the population and select a sample (statistical or judgmental)
  3. Perform audit procedures:

    • Vouching — trace recorded transactions back to source documents (tests existence/occurrence)
    • Tracing — trace source documents forward to recorded transactions (tests completeness)
    • Recalculation — independently recalculate key amounts
    • Confirmation — verify balances with third parties (banks, customers, vendors)
    • Analytical procedures — compare to expectations, prior periods, or industry benchmarks
  4. Document findings:

    • For each finding, record:
      • Condition — what was found
      • Criteria — what was expected
      • Cause — why the discrepancy exists
      • Effect — financial impact
      • Recommendation — corrective action
  5. Write the artifact to .metapowers/accounting/$ARGUMENTS/audit.md with sections:

    • Audit Scope & Objectives — what was audited and why
    • Procedures Performed — tests conducted and samples selected
    • Findings — each finding with condition, criteria, cause, effect, recommendation
    • Conclusion — overall assessment of account accuracy and reliability

Output

The audit written to .metapowers/accounting/$ARGUMENTS/audit.md. Present a summary highlighting:

  • Number of findings by severity
  • Total financial impact of discrepancies
  • Key recommendations