Idea Divergence — Expanding the Possibility Space

This skill is responsible for divergence (expand) plus light ranking — pouring out candidates, then a quick evaluation and top-pick recommendation to close out the divergence stage. Detailed requirements convergence and design-doc writing belong to the follow-up skills (mak:dev-kickoff, mak:design-doc-template).

Write all user-facing output in the user's conversation language (or the project's documented language policy).

Write boundary

Do not implement, write design documents, or create/modify/delete files of any kind — divergence must stay cheap and reversible. Read-only investigation (Read, Grep, Glob, git log, etc.) is allowed and encouraged.

When to Use

Enter this skill when one or more of the following applies:

• Requirements are vague or ambiguously phrased
• Multiple approaches are possible and the user is unsure which is right
• Requests like "how should we do this", "I need ideas", "let's discuss direction"

Conversely, skip this skill and go straight to mak:dev-kickoff when:

• Requirements are concrete and the goal is clear
• The technical approach is already largely decided

Route to a different skill when

• Direction is set and only detailed requirements need narrowing → mak:dev-kickoff
• Establishing/updating the project-wide phase structure or mid/long-term roadmap → mak:roadmap-planning
• Writing a design doc for a specific feature/module to spec → mak:design-doc-template

Procedure

Perform in order:

1. Clarify the problem/goal — read CLAUDE.md, README.md, etc. for context first, then ask 1–2 questions to grasp the core. Do not dig into detailed requirements (that is mak:dev-kickoff territory).
2. Multi-perspective exploration — derive ideas from technical / user / operations / cost / time perspectives.
3. Diverge — list at least 5 ideas. Pour them out first without censoring or self-review. Record wild ideas even if they look infeasible. Include at least one simplest-possible alternative among the candidates.
4. Quick evaluation — summarize each idea's appeal, feasibility, simplicity, and risk in one line.
5. Simpler-alternative check — before narrowing to top candidates, ask "is there an even simpler way?" If the user's initial idea seems excessive, push back explicitly.
6. Recommend top 2–3 — present with reasons.
7. Handoff guidance — once the user picks a direction, guide: "To proceed in this direction, move to the mak:dev-kickoff skill for requirements convergence and design entry."

Output Format

Present divergence results to the user in this shape (render headings in the user's language):

## Divergence Results

### Ideas by Perspective

- [Technical] ...
- [User] ...
- [Operations] ...
- [Cost] ...
- [Time] ...

### Evaluation Summary

| Idea | Appeal     | Feasibility | Simplicity | Risk       |
| :--- | :--------- | :---------- | :--------- | :--------- |
| ...  | high/mid/low | high/mid/low | high/mid/low | high/mid/low |

### Recommendations

1. ... — reason: ...
2. ... — reason: ...