codex-verification-discipline

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing; run verification and read the output before any success claim.

SKILL.md

GitHub

TL;DR

Evidence before claims. Run the command, read the output, THEN claim the result. No shortcuts. No "should work." No exceptions.

Verification Before Completion

Activation

  1. Activate before ANY claim of completion, success, or passing status.
  2. Activate on explicit $codex-verification-discipline, $verify, or $evidence.
  3. Activate before committing, PR creation, or task sign-off.
  4. Activate when about to move to the next task.
  5. This skill is always-loaded — it runs as a constant behavioral constraint.

Announce at start: "I'm verifying before claiming completion."

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.

Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.

The Gate Function

BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:

1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
   - If NO: State actual status with evidence
   - If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim

Skip any step = lying, not verifying

Common Violations

Claim Requires Not Sufficient
Tests pass Test command output: 0 failures Previous run, "should pass"
Linter clean Linter output: 0 errors Partial check, extrapolation
Build succeeds Build command: exit 0 Linter passing, logs look good
Bug fixed Test original symptom: passes Code changed, assumed fixed
Regression test works Red-green cycle verified Test passes once
Agent completed VCS diff shows changes Agent reports "success"
Requirements met Line-by-line checklist Tests passing

Red Flags — STOP

If you catch yourself thinking or writing:

  • Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
  • Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
  • About to commit/push/PR without verification
  • Trusting agent success reports
  • Relying on partial verification
  • Thinking "just this once"
  • ANY wording implying success without having run verification

Rationalization Prevention

Excuse Reality
"Should work now" RUN the verification
"I'm confident" Confidence ≠ evidence
"Just this once" No exceptions
"Linter passed" Linter ≠ compiler ≠ tests
"Agent said success" Verify independently
"Partial check is enough" Partial proves nothing
"Different words so rule doesn't apply" Spirit over letter
"It's trivial" Trivial things break. Run it.

Evidence Patterns

Tests:

✅ [Run test command] → [See: 34/34 pass] → "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"

Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):

✅ Write → Run (FAIL) → Implement → Run (PASS) → "Regression test verified"
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)

Build:

✅ [Run build] → [See: exit 0] → "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter ≠ build)

Requirements:

✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"

Agent delegation:

✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report

When To Apply

ALWAYS before:

  • ANY variation of success/completion claims
  • ANY expression of satisfaction
  • ANY positive statement about work state
  • Committing, PR creation, task completion
  • Moving to next task
  • Delegating to agents

Integration with Other Skills

Skill How Verification Integrates
codex-test-driven-development Verify RED and GREEN steps with actual test output
codex-execution-quality-gate Gate scripts provide the evidence; this skill ensures you actually READ the output
codex-systematic-debugging Verify root cause fix with regression test evidence
codex-subagent-execution Verify subagent output with VCS diff, not agent reports
codex-branch-finisher Verify tests before presenting completion options

Script Invocation Discipline

  1. When this workflow calls helper scripts from other skills, run --help first.
  2. Treat helper scripts as black-box tools and execute by contract before reading source.
  3. Read script source only when customization or bug-fixing is required.

The Bottom Line

No shortcuts for verification.

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

This is non-negotiable.