Compare Options

This skill allows the agent to systematically measure, compare, and optimize choices to ensure the objectively best available path is selected with documented rationale.

Steps

1. Enumerate all options. List every available option clearly. Do not pre-filter based on assumption.
2. Define evaluation criteria. Identify the dimensions that matter (e.g., cost, speed, risk, compatibility, reversibility). Weight each criterion if applicable.
3. Score each option per criterion. Use a consistent scale (e.g., 1–5) and apply it neutrally across all options.
4. Build the comparison matrix. Organize scores into a table for clear visual comparison.
5. Identify the winner. Select the option with the highest weighted score, noting any exceptions (e.g., a hard constraint that disqualifies a leading option).
6. Document trade-offs. Explicitly state what is sacrificed with the winning choice.
7. Output the recommendation with the matrix, winner, rationale, and trade-offs.

Output Format

benchmark_result:
  criteria: ["criterion_1", "criterion_2"]
  matrix:
    option_a: {criterion_1: 4, criterion_2: 3}
    option_b: {criterion_1: 2, criterion_2: 5}
  winner: "option_b"
  rationale: "<why this wins>"
  trade_offs:
    - "<what is sacrificed by choosing option_b>"

Notes

• Always make criteria explicit before scoring — implicit criteria lead to biased outcomes.
• If options have hard disqualifying constraints, flag them before scoring.