diagnose-failed-run
Determine the TRUE cause of a failed retort run before attributing it. Ground-truth every failure (run its tests, read its agent logs, inspect its workspace) and classify it as an infrastructure false
SKILL.mdskills/diagnose-failed-run/SKILL.md
GitHubDiagnose a Failed Retort Run
Overview
A run failing the mechanical gate (test_coverage=0 → all metrics zeroed → status=failed)
says only that the tests didn't run/pass under the scorer — not that the model
produced bad code. Historically most "failures" in this repo were harness/measurement
artifacts, not model defects. This skill is the judgment layer on top of retort diagnose:
it establishes the real cause with direct evidence before anyone attributes, reports,
or gates on it.
It exists because we repeatedly drew wrong conclusions by inferring from a signature ("flaky", "concurrency", a wrong env var, a wrong tool-permission fix) that end-to-end checks later overturned. The cost of guessing here is hours and bad decisions.
Cardinal rules
- Ground-truth before concluding. Run the tests yourself, inspect the workspace, read the agent logs. Never attribute a cause from the gate verdict, a duration, or a single log line alone.
- Label every claim
[DIRECT](observed: command output, file state, a reproduced result) vs[HYPOTHESIS](inferred, not yet tested). Don't ship a hypothesis as a cause. If a cause is unconfirmed, say so and name the experiment that would confirm it. - Read the DB and the agent logs. The recorded scores/session show which tool or
step failed; the agent stderr shows why (the permission type, the error). You usually
need both — e.g. the session said "read rejected", but only
--print-logsstderr revealed the real permission wasexternal_directory. - Verify any fix end-to-end (through the harness), not just CLI/unit. A fix that passes a CLI probe can still fail in the runner (a wrong env var passed both).
Inputs in each runs/<cell>/repN/
| File | Use |
|---|---|
TASK.md |
What the agent was asked to build |
stack.json |
language / agent / model / tooling for this cell |
scores.json |
recorded metrics (all 0 ⇒ gate-failed) |
| generated source | what the agent actually produced — check it exists and where (subdirs/packages count) |
_agent_stdout.log |
the agent's full --format json / --mode json event stream (tool calls + their status, errors, the final text) |
_agent_stderr.log |
the agent's internal logs (permission evaluations, hangs, provider errors) — for opencode, requires --print-logs |
If _agent_*.log are absent, the run predates log capture; reconstruct from the agent's
own session db (e.g. opencode's OPENCODE_DB sibling) and add capture before re-running.
Procedure
- Mechanical pass first:
retort diagnose --experiment-dir <dir>labels each failed runTOOLING(recovers withretort rescore --only-failed) vsGENUINE. Start here; this skill handles the cases it can't auto-resolve. - Ground-truth each failure (do NOT skip even for
GENUINE):- Does code exist, and where? A "no code" verdict is often just a package subdir
(
app/,src/) the eye/glob missed. - Run the tests yourself in a clean copy with deps installed
(
pytest/cargo test/go test ./.../mvn test/ …). Passing tests ⇒ it's a scorer false-fail, not a model miss. - Read
_agent_stdout.logfor the failing tool call + status; read_agent_stderr.logfor the reason.
- Does code exist, and where? A "no code" verdict is often just a package subdir
(
- Classify the cause (see taxonomy). State it
[DIRECT]with the evidence. - Isolate intermittent/ambiguous causes with a controlled A/B — change exactly one variable (e.g. shared vs isolated db; baseline vs with-fix batch) and compare. Log what you dropped; don't conclude from n=1.
- Reproduce-with-full-capture before declaring an intermittent cause — run it enough
times to catch one with
_agent_*.logcaptured, then read the events at the abort. - Verify the fix end-to-end through the harness, then re-score / re-run.
Cause taxonomy
A. Infrastructure false-fail (code works; the harness mis-scored it → fix the harness, then rescore):
- Scorer gap — language/runner the scorer doesn't handle (e.g. a Bun
bun:testproject the TS scorer can't measure). - Undeclared / transitive deps — model omits
requirements.txt; tests fail at import (incl. transitive deps likehttpxfor fastapi/starlette TestClient). - Permission auto-deny — headless agent denies a tool (opencode's
external_directory: ask→deny on the temp workspace) → aborts with no code. - Concurrency/env contention — shared state (opencode's single
opencode.db) → fast-fail at startup under parallelism. - Mis-measurement — coverage parsed as 0 on passing tests, etc.
B. Genuine model miss (real, count it; not fixable in the harness):
- Won't compile / tests genuinely fail / no tests written / no or partial deliverable / code in the wrong place the task didn't ask for.
C. Environment (transient/operational, not the model or harness logic):
- Rate-limit / credit cutoff (check the provider key's usage/limit), stray processes, resource exhaustion, OS cleanup.
Tells (and their trap)
The classic tell — fails instantly for ~$0 ⇒ harness; burns model time ⇒ genuine — is a starting hint, not a verdict. It breaks when scoring is the failure point: a run can burn minutes producing working code and still be scored 0 (scorer false-fail). And a fast no-code abort can be a harness permission denial, not a model giving up. Always ground-truth.
Output
Per failure, report: cell · cause (one of the taxonomy) · [DIRECT]/[HYPOTHESIS] with the
evidence · recommended action (retort rescore; fix scorer/harness then rescore; count as
genuine; re-run with capture). Then the rolled-up verdict: how many failures are infra vs
genuine, and whether the infrastructure is trustworthy enough to proceed.
Logging setup (prerequisite)
- The runner persists
_agent_stdout.log/_agent_stderr.logper run (_persist_agent_output). - For opencode, the harness passes
--print-logsso stderr carries the diagnostic logs (permission evaluations, step loop). Raising opencode's level (--log-level DEBUG,OPENCODE_LOG_LEVEL=verbose) adds ~nothing — the--format jsonstdout stream is the signal.
See also
retort diagnose/retort rescore— automated TOOLING/GENUINE triage + recovery.evaluate-runskill — the per-run spec/quality evaluation (this skill is for failures).